A country’s government should be sovereign. If it is not democratic it shouldn’t continue to be the government. Once there is a computer that runs on the program there is the danger that someone substitutes the wrong program and counts the votes wrong. You can see the same kind of issue arising in many areas of life. For instance, a SaaSS translation service: The user sends text to the server, and the server translates it and sends the translation back to the user.But the point is even within things that are lawful, businesses wouldn’t listen to people.If the page has a like button and you visit that page and you see the like button Facebook knows you are visiting that page.

But businesses don’t pretend to be democratic; they don’t pretend to do what the people say.Governments should be and usually are more or less democratic. This is unacceptable in democracy.However, even if you have a simple machine, non-programmable machine that counts votes there still is danger there, which is those totals cannot be audited. So the only way you can have democratic decision-making is when the government takes decisions rather than the businesses. Business owners say this is what we want and this is what we are going to do; screw all of you. Schools morally ought to teach only free software and for public schools it is the government’s responsibility to make this true.)As told to John Mary.Non-free software was the first route for companies to take control of people’s computing. So either way it gets to the state. I can envision an electronic device which is not programmable and there is no processor inside and where the circuit assures that the counting is done correctly. The biggest threat to privacy is not targeted search. There is a lot of free software that is easy to use and then there are other free programs that are not that polished and not as easy; to use they need more work. SaaSS doesn’t mean the programs on the server are non-free (though they often are).CautionBut the state has to be cautious in exercising its powers, especially when it confronts individual freedoms. Using SaaSS causes same injustices as using a non-free program: they are two paths to the same bad place.We live in a sort of a feudal society.

They centrally turn farmers into their vassals. Once there is a computer that runs on the program there is the danger that someone substitutes the wrong program. These days various businesses are feudal lords, this applies to many fields, not only to IT. For instance, many web pages report who visits them and they report to many companies and Facebook is one of them.Look at the recent expose of Cambridge Analytica. So if somebody alters the totals, there is no way to prove that they are not correct totals.If a company collects data there will be a law requiring the company to hand it over to the state.Respect for the privacy of the general public means not accumulating data bases; about where a person goes, what the person does during the day and who the person talks with. He is the inventor of the original much-imitated EMACS editor, now at the Artificial Intelligence Lab at MIT. For instance, you can look at seed companies like Bayer and Monsanto as feudal lords of farming. The people need to organise and checkmate businesses. Whatever the users do, they do so under the overall dominion of these companies except for me and people like me who will not serve them. But that does not happen to me because my browser is designed to block the like button and everything else like that.

So you cannot expect to have democracy through businesses. This is, letting someone else’s server do your own computing tasks. A legitimate government has to be democratic. For non-free software Spying is just one kind of malicious functionality.The government should not abandon the control of schools computing to the private business because the governments have a responsibility and the schools too have the responsibility. Computational sovereignty is a concept that applies to governments, especially to countries. In order for us to have privacy systems to collect data, massive surveillance must be prohibited. It should make decisions about that country in accord with the people that it serves.(The author is the most prominent proponent and practitioner of Free Software. He has worked extensively on compilers, editors, debuggers, command interpreters, the Incompatible Timesharing System and the Lisp Machine operating system. The company can profile people and rig elections, manipulated basically, and the state can identify dissidents and prosecute them. So in the same way, companies like Apple and Microsoft, Amazon and Google turn users into their vassals. Rather it is surveying everyone on a massive surveillance. It depends which free program it is. It doesn’t matter whether it is a business or a government that collects the data. These companies are doing a lot of bad things to you in addition to profiling you.The threat to freedom in the digital age is from the non-free, proprietor-driven software, encompassing all forms of computing. Actually that was just the most scandalous cases of many cases.EVMIt is dangerous. They are not controlled by democratic decision-making. But if the country is controlled by companies and the government can’t make the important decisions at all then the people can’t have democracy either. But in case of paper ballots, it is possible to count them again. Now, there is Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). If the counting is done as people vote and all that remains at the end is the total, you can verify that total is correct and this is why experts are reaching a conclusion that voting should be done with paper ballots. They collect data in nasty ways. Now, the job of translating is under the control of PVC injection molding machine Manufacturers the server operator rather than the user

Posted by: adelinzhe at 02:33 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1002 words, total size 6 kb.

Responsible citizens like Bamboo House India’s Prashant Lingam and Aruna Kappagantula, Icrisat’s ex-scientist Murali Sharma, architect and interior designer Kalpana Ramesh and Our Sacred Space founder Nayantara Nandakumar are all passionate about preserving the planet, with their homes boasting some of the finest eco-credentials. We have septic tanks and recycle grey water.An increasing number of celebrities and conscientious citizens are undertaking green measures in a bid towards sustainable living.Even our watchmen and society staff have steel cups so they don’t buy tea in plastic cups.Close to natureEnvironmental engineer Nayantara Nandakumar exposes the simple logic behind ecological sustainability, sustainable lifestyles and architecture.Take the case of actress Dia Mirza, whose home is a reflection of who she is. It has solar power, harnesses rainwater, and the interiors are built entirely with eco-friendly materials.Similarly, actor Prakash Raj utilised sustainable principles while building his second home, which was not just easy on the earth, but on his conscience too. "It’s a dream house — electricity, water, cooling tunnels — everything is self sustainable. We segregate waste, do composting, have water gauge automated systems to avoid tank overflows, and have banned plastic decorations for events.”

Meanwhile, Gul Panag’s home near Pune is registered under Small Versatile Affordable GRIHA system (SVAGRIHA) — where a rainwater harvesting system and solar panels meet the daily water and power needs. And we use our office as a demonstration facility,” says Prashant Lingam, the founder of Bamboo House India. There is abundant ventilation and air circulation. And while you may see some sunlight in the gaps between the slabs, it is rain proof. Celebrities from Dia Mirza to Gul Panag and Prakash Raj have gone the extra mile to create green houses that will inspire their fans to do the same. "Building an eco-friendly house is not as difficult as some people assume. Used water goes into two soak pits to enrich the ground water table.. Prakash Raj’s homes in Chennai and Hyderabad, lit up by solar power, rainwater harvesting, and interiors built with eco-friendly materials.

But when I had the opportunity to do up my office, we made sure it’s off the grid — right from the flooring, roof, walls, furniture, tiles and wash basins — everything is either eco-friendly or recycled. Water is from the borewell. It remains cool and comfortable. We use ash and soapnut based dishwashing mixtures,” she says, explaining some of the measures in place. In an effort to keep alive and popularise local craftsmanship, the meditation hall, Padmam, has been made with wooden beams and rafters covered by slabs of slate, the traditional roof in the area. The Meadow Dance is designed around the unique concept of earth sheltered homes.

And of course, we don’t use plastic bags,” says eco champion Dia, adding, "I have also planted indigenous plants that attract bio diversity, so my windows provide a natural haven, with birds, butterflies and bees providing a sense of peace, calm and beauty.Nayantara adds, "The vernacular architecture of the region is exquisite but fast vanishing. We avoid bringing in any plastic, and are moving towards zero waste."My current home is an old construction, so I could not do much about it. We even want to do bio gas for cooking with garbage and sewage recycling,” says Kalpana, an interior designer and architect, who is also engaged in environmental issues. Kitchen waste, leaf litter and anything that decomposes is converted to compost,” he explains.Even builders like Total Environment Homes are increasingly courting environmentally-minded two color injection molding machine Manufacturers consumers by offering features and using building techniques that would have been considered a novelty a few years ago. Kalpana and Ramesh Loganathan’s new home will be completely off the grid. The trend of ecological responsibility is fast catching up among the elite set as several public figures are setting about remodeling their homes to keep the planet healthy. Born and brought up in Hyderabad amidst green surroundings, she credits her parents for incorporating the love-of-nature in her.It’s not just the stars who are going green. We have solar panels and rain water harvesting too. I want my children to respect nature,” says the actor.

"At Our Sacred Space Dharur, we run the house on solar power. "We conserve and recycle water. One of the many steps Dia has taken to go green includes replacing all plastic containers at her home with glass and ceramic jars. A practical, hands-on working intelligence along with age old building techniques is used by our local masons and workers. The result is a home that they retrofitted for sustainability."I have made every effort to make our home and co-operative housing as eco-friendly as possible. In Dharur village, most home owners work alongside a mason to build their homes, which is an enriching experience in itself.So what does the term ‘sustainable homes’ really mean? As Kalpana Loganathan explains, a lot goes into an eco-friendly home, right from insulation to energy supply, appliances to the floor plan layout. Along with this, a large double glazed window eliminates the need for air-conditioning inside the home. The landscaped earth cover also reduces rainwater run-off.”Similarly, when scientist Murali Sharma retired from Icrisat, he wanted to ensure that he and his family lived a life as close to nature as possible. A blanket of earth keeps these homes relatively cool in summer and warm in winter. Each home has a courtyard, is built with natural materials, and is individually customisable

Posted by: adelinzhe at 01:45 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 914 words, total size 6 kb.